I. Scripture
A. Sermon
1. Scriptural Exegesis (3 pages)
Luke 10:1-11 and 16-20 are many things: they are a narrative of a series of events that happened. They are a set of teachings of Christ. They are a description of how Christ sent his followers out to evangelize. Dr. David Tiede states that “this entire passage may well have been read as a handbook on evangelization. As such, it is remarkable for its vision of simplicity, clarity on the message of peace and refusal to allow the messengers to use force or exercise judgment.”
[1] It is important to realize that the author of the Book of Luke was writing largely for a non-Jewish audience. With this in mind, the word “proclamation” takes a whole different meaning. It is different to proclaim the authority and love of God to an audience that comes from outside of the Jewish, and now Christian, tradition than it is to proclaim to those with whom you share a common cultural understanding. Keeping this in mind, we must recognize that the author is interested in asserting both the authority of those who are among Jesus’ disciples, and of the presence of the Kingdom of God, as established in the personhood of Christ and in the church.
This being the case then, these 70 (or 72, depending on the interpretation) would be trained to travel light, to use proper social protocol, such as the traditional greeting of “Peace be to this house!”, which references the greeting King David’s servants used. As Dr. Tiede states in his commentary, this form of greeting is “…an official declaration of the presence of the kingdom, and it confronts the people of the house with God’s salvation and authority. It is a word of blessing”.
[2] If this Word and declaration was rejected, the disciples were commanded to separate themselves quickly and cleanly from the place.
The focus, though, needs to be more on the proclamation of the Kingdom of God rather than the actions and anxieties of the disciples. The proclamation of the Kingdom is itself a blessing and a transformational act. Jesus states in verse 18-19 that “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a flash of lightning. See, I have given you authority to treat on snakes and scorpions and over all the power of the enemy; and nothing will hurt you.”
Here, Jesus is affirming that he saw Satan fall as a result of the missionary work of the 70. Their work itself, the proclamation of the Kingdom of God, played a role in changing the balance and the relationship between God and Satan. But Jesus goes on to warn the disciples not to get too overconfident or cocky. He states in verse 20 that “Nevertheless, do not rejoice at this, that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.” It is not the act of bringing the spirit of evil down that should cause celebration. That credit belongs with God’s Holy Spirit, working through the disciples. Rather, celebration lies in their place in the Kingdom of God, the Kingdom which they proclaim.
2. Reflective Piece (1 page)
This sermon is prepared for Lord of Life Lutheran Church in Maple Grove, Minnesota. Lord of Life is a congregation of approximately 7,400 baptized members. Maple Grove is an affluent northwest suburb of Minneapolis. Lord of Life is a rapidly growing congregation. The congregation is currently growing faster than its capacity to create meaningful connections for people in terms of ministry. It is an easy congregation to be “anonymous” within.
Politically and socially, Lord of Life is reflective of the community. Its membership is largely “middle of the road” to conservative.
I would mention the Fourth of July holiday for two different reasons: First, quite simply, the day is a national holiday and while it can be argued that Christians are called to a deeper level of loyalty to God than to national interests, it would also be silly not to acknowledge that we are Christians who live in a particular national context. To not mention the holiday would itself be awkward. The second reason is that I believe we are called to live as Christians within the world. God calls us to be Christians within our context (in this case, national) and to affect the system within which we live. We live in a system that celebrates our independence via a national holiday. To ignore that would be ignoring an opportunity to witness of the love, grace and freedom that only God can provide, by placing that holiday in the context of our faith.
3. Hermeneutical Issues (1 page)
This was a difficult text on which to write a sermon. To borrow a phrase from a colleague, this is a “well packed” text. There are numerous different ways that this scripture could speak to the congregation. Possible themes might be the selection and the expansion of the disciples; Jesus’ phrase that “The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few”; The charge of the disciples on how to travel and to share faith in Christ with people, or the charge to the disciples to serve.
I chose in this sermon to focus on the return of the seventy people being the declaration of a transformational event in the lives of the participants, and presumably, those with whom they shared their faith. I did so because I believe that in the community in which I serve, the predominant sense regarding sharing our faith with others is one of haplessness. Quite simply, the people with whom I work do not think themselves capable of sharing their faith. My goal then is to use the story of this group of 70 whom Jesus sent as role models. I want the people at Lord of Life to realize that the story of these followers is also their own story. Jesus calls, teaches, sends and celebrates with us in our lives today in the same manner he did with the disciples in Biblical times.
I chose to interpret this scripture (this time) as a challenge to share and a promise that we are not alone and that Christ celebrates with us the ministry. As Dr. Tiede states, “Jesus is rejoicing in the dynamic power of God’s presence and dominion which have been revealed.”
[3] 4. Sermon Manuscript (2-3 pages)
Dear friends,
Grace and peace to you from God our Creator, and from Jesus Christ, His Son and our Lord. Amen
And Happy Independence Day! This day of celebration is one of great importance for those of us who live in this nation. Our freedom is a gift and it is right to celebrate it. Our hope is that throughout the day, you and your loved ones can spend time together as a family. Have fun! Picnic! Spend time together! Watch fireworks! And remember the gifts that God gives our nation and be thankful! Our hope is that today is a day of celebration for you.
Celebration is something of a lost art in our culture today. In the midst of the high-speed, intense and stressful society in which we live, it is more and more difficult for us to loosen up and to celebrate the significant moments of our lives.
Case in point: It was my birthday last month. It was, as my wife would describe it, a significant birthday. I’ll just leave it at “it wasn’t my 30th birthday, and it wasn’t my 50th birthday.” You can figure it out from there.
For the several weeks prior to the day, Lori would ask me semi-regularly “have you thought about what you want to do for your birthday?” “No,” I replied, “I haven’t given it much thought yet.” Over and over she asked…over and over I expressed my denial. Finally, when the day came, we settled on a simple dinner with another couple; friends we had not seen in a long time. Our friends didn’t even know it was my birthday. Of course, at the restaurant, my wife let the word slip. While I gave in to the free dessert, I worked pretty hard to convince the restaurant’s serving person to not have the entire wait staff come to sing to me. Ok, I’ll admit it: I begged.
To be completely honest: I’m not very good at celebrating. I really don’t think that any of us are. I’m not sure if it’s that we don’t really know how, or that we don’t want to draw undue attention to ourselves, or if the very value of celebrating itself is diminishing.
An NFL team could be losing a game by 42 points. And then when a receiver catches an ordinary pass for a touchdown, he launches into an end zone dance that is such a production; you’d think he might have just cured cancer; and he was just doing what he gets paid to do! Can you imagine a CPA, strutting, breakdancing and spinning on their head after completing a successful audit? No, of course not. We don’t celebrate the ordinary. When the ordinary things in life become the cause of huge celebration, it diminishes those special moments that are worthy of celebration. But my fear is that because of the mixed messages we receive, we don’t celebrate at all. We don’t celebrate the ordinary, and we don’t often complete the extraordinary…so why celebrate?
I know I’m not alone in this. It is becoming more and more difficult for us to experience real joy in our culture. I’m not just talking about happiness. Happiness might be what we experience when we buy something we really wanted, or we receive a gift, or a raise. I’m talking about joy. Joy: the emotion that lives in our soul because something deep and exciting is at work. Joy changes us. Joy is rare. Joy is profound. Joy is a gift. Joy is rarely experienced, and even harder to express.
This is true in our faith lives as well as elsewhere. We live in a faith community where we gather on Saturday nights or Sunday mornings for worship. Whenever we worship, we remember Easter, the ultimate victory, the ultimate reason for celebration. Our worship itself is an expression of the joy that comes from knowing that “Jesus Christ is risen today!”
But we don’t say ALLELUIA! We say alleluia. There is a difference. Erma Bombeck described Christians as people who “sing ‘Make a Joyful Noise Unto the Lord’ while our faces reflect the sadness of one who has just buried a rich aunt who left everything to her pregnant hamster.” In the world in which we live, it is difficult to be people of joy. Our sense of joy gets beaten down day after day. Don’t get me wrong: My message for you today is not: “Don’t worry…be happy…” Life doesn’t work that way. It’s not that simple. You know it…I know it. Life is full of challenge. Our Gospel lesson for today gives us a concrete example:
The disciple’s story is one of challenge and celebration: Here, Jesus gives one of his most difficult and intimidating instructions to the disciples. He has grown his group of dedicated followers to over 70. And now Jesus is sending them out. These 70 frightened people stood before Jesus. They were being commissioned to spread out to the surrounding towns and to minister to people in Christ’s name.
Jesus must not have expected it to go particularly well. He gave very specific instructions about what his followers should do when they are rejected. The welcome mat would not always be out for them. The anxiety of his followers must have been extreme.
When have we felt like our faith is a challenge? When have we known that our faith might cost us something? Perhaps it is when someone at work asks a question about, or presents a challenge to your faith. It might be when you have to make a choice between a wrong you’re a drawn to, and a right that God calls you to. There might be a person at your work who would really benefit from an invitation to our faith community, but you might be worried about “pushing your beliefs on them.” Or perhaps you don’t feel particularly close to God. Maybe you question, and doubt. Maybe you’ve been hurt. Maybe you wonder how God could possibly love someone like you. For you, feeling joy may seem very far away.
There is a tension inherent in being a Christian. It is rooted in questions: “Do I experience the love that Christ gives?” “Do I understand that if God’s grace is real, it is real for me?” “Are we living as God would want us to live?”
The gifts God offers do not depend on our answers to these questions. But our lives of faithfulness; our response to God’s gifts, our sense of joy in what God does in our lives does.
Like those 70, we stand before Jesus who says, “it might not be easy. But it’s what I want for you. And I am with you regardless. I am sending you.”
Luckily for us, the story does not end at the point of Jesus sending them out. When the 70 returned home, the scripture describes them as being full of joy. They said “Lord, in your name, even the demons submit to us.” They celebrated. Their fear was turned into joy. They celebrated not because they did something wonderful and amazing. Rather, they celebrated because they had discovered the power of truth; the truth that only Jesus Christ can provide. It was real! It changed the lives of others! It changed their lives! God’s truth transforms!
I wish I could have seen the look on Jesus face. Did he say “I told you so!” Probably not. But he celebrated. In verse 21 he says “At that same hour Jesus rejoiced in the Holy Spirit.” But first he reminds them that it is not their work, but the work of God’s Spirit that made their service possible.
Jesus sent those insecure, unsure, nervous followers out to share about their experiences. When they returned, they did so amazed and joyful at how God worked through them. God turned their fear into joy.
Jesus sends us out; insecure, unsure, and nervous followers, to share about our faith experiences. It is not easy. But when we return to this place, we will do so amazed and joyful at how God works through us. Just as with the disciples, God has given us the gift of Truth. God’s grace, love and forgiveness are for you. God knows you. God loves you and nothing will take that away. You are given the gift of grace. You are forgiven. It is real! It changes the lives of others! It changes our lives! God’s truth transforms!
God’s message to you is to share with others, despite the challenges. This place, this sanctuary, is not intended to be a somber or quiet place. There are those moments, but God intends this room, this gathering to be a place of joy, where the stories of what God is doing are told and celebrated. To witness what God does is exciting. To share it is natural. God turns our fear, our apprehension, our unworthiness into joy. Outside of this building, let us do God’s will, living, serving and telling others. Let us look for God’s work in the world and then name it for others. Inside this building, let us celebrate that work, with love, and with joy.
Amen.
II. Theological Reflection
A. Factors shaping my understanding of Christ’s suffering and death. (1 page)
There are a number of factors which shape my understanding of Christ’s suffering and death. However, it is important to point out that my understanding of this act on our (my) behalf is, at a fundamental level, ineffable. Speaking first as a recipient of that amazing grace, and secondly as a parent who would literally die on behalf of my child, I cannot grasp this act of sacrifice on my behalf.
The first factor that has shaped my understanding, (first not because of its impact or importance, but because it is most recent on my mind) is my CPE experience at Unity and Mercy Hospitals. I have been present in a hospital room with a patient and often family during a time of obvious suffering. I have been able to witness that suffering in many different forms. To have people open these windows into their lives to me has been an amazing experience. I have been present when people gasped their final breaths. I have prayed with families as life-support has been removed. I have held the hands of new widows who wailed over the bodies of their spouses.
These experiences have helped me to understand what Christ might have experienced on the cross, and what the disciples must have experienced.
Likewise, I have experienced the death of my own father. This experience, and the journey of grief that I experienced over the next 3 years took me into places of despair that I did not know existed. It was the love and grace of God, manifest in my wife, in my community and the subsequent births of my two sons that lifted me out of these depths. It was only God that could lift me out of this.
Another significant experience, that I do not yet completely understand, is the baptism of my sons. Standing at the font, and experiencing the water being poured over our children and experiencing them being joined to the death and resurrection of Christ was a very powerful and tangible experience. Though this was a theology I had taught for years, it became real to me at that moment. I had the moment of recognition that these two boys, who I loved completely, did not “belong” to me. They belong to the God who claims them.
Finally, the book, The Ragamuffin Gospel by Brennan Manning, a Catholic spiritual director, has stimulated my thinking about Christ’s suffering, especially as it relates to the grace of God. Manning writes that “One night a dear friend of Roslyn’s named Joe McGill was praying over this passage in John: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God…The Word was made flesh, he lived among us…” (John 1:1, 14) In the bright darkness of faith, he heard Jesus say: “Yes, the Word was made flesh. I chose to enter your broken world and limp through life with you.”
[4] Manning’s description of “The Victorious Limp” (the chapter title) and his writing had a profound impact on my understanding of the interconnectedness between Christ’s suffering, God’s love and our lives.
B. How would I approach Scripture to deepen my understanding of Christ’s suffering and death? (11/2 – 2 pages)
The first observation that needs to be made is that in no way can I ever understanding Christ’s suffering and death, nor the sacrifice that God made in that terrible, wonderful act. As a father of two boys, I could not begin to understand how God could allow this act to happen. In all honesty, if ever put in a situation of choosing between Nathan or Samuel and the rest of creation, I would choose Nathan or Samuel. They are my life.
So for God to choose a fallen humanity over his own Son is difficult for me to grasp at an emotional or cognitive level. As the recipient of that act of grace, however, I am grateful.
To understand this senseless act of love, I would first have to turn to the story itself. I would read the story of the crucifixion, probably in the “New International Version”, that with which I am most comfortable. Then I would read it again, this time in the Revised or New Revised Standard Version. In these two versions I would seek out the subtle differences in language that might lead me into thought and reflection.
Second, I would read commentaries to see what scholars have said about these scriptures and to see what new insights might come from their thoughts. I normally, at this point, just take some time to reflect and to think. I’ve found that giving myself “space” for the scriptures to speak to me is important. I try to reflect on the emotions of the primary characters of the story and try to connect them to my own story. How might I feel if I were the parent of Jesus watching him suffer and die? What might I be willing to give up to prevent that from happening?
What if I were one of the other criminals on the cross? What might I be witnessing and how might I process that into my own experience? What if I were a guard, either keeping the crowds at bay or assisting with the actual resurrection? What if I were Pontius Pilate, or Barabbas? How might I perceive the suffering and death of Jesus through their lens?
Then I might turn to other sections of scripture, including the stories of the crucifixion from other Gospels. I’d also seek out and examine Old Testament prophesies that talked about the death and sacrifice, including Isaiah 51, Psalm 11 and Psalm 75. I’d probably pay special attention to Isaiah 53. I would also look at epistle writings that focus on sacrifice. Most prominent would be Romans 3:25 and Ephesians 5:2.
My goal in looking at these scriptures would be to gather as complete a picture of what was happening as possible, including the prophesy of the act and the interpretation of the act. The point of these different texts is not to “prove” or “corroborate”, but rather to bring about understanding and growth.
I would seek out the wisdom of my community. I have discovered great wisdom among my colleagues, friends and family. I would ask them how they have experienced suffering and how they connect spiritually to the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Finally, I would pray for understanding.
Then, I begin the process again. I believe that there is a living quality to scripture that speaks to me in different ways at different times. As I am growing spiritually, and as our culture changes, scripture speaks differently. It is not that the meaning of scripture changes, but rather the heart of the person hearing it. So one could hear the same story every year and it would affect them differently each time that they do.
My understanding of Christ’s death, suffering and resurrection is fresh for me each time that I hear it. It is vital that I continue to explore it as it is the core of all that is of value to me.
C. Two or three theological resources (1 page)
Besides the scripture story, there are several other theological resources that I would want to make use of in theological reflection. I would want to make use of the writings in the Book of Concord on the second article of the Creed. I would also make use of Luther’s meaning to the second article in the Small Catechism. I would use these two resources to get at the theological implications through the lens of our own tradition. While I don’t want to be myopic in reflection, I think that this would be a wise place to begin.
Another theological resource that I would consult is Brennan Manning’s The Signature of Jesus on the Pages of my Heart. (I realize that this is the second Brennan Manning book I’ve mentioned. I do read other authors as well, but Manning has been very influential for me and these pieces fit the questions in this essay.) Manning’s observation that we have “mineralized” the cross, by taking an ugly symbol of death and turning it into jewelry, has had a profound impact in my understanding of the Theology of the Cross.
I would also consult Douglas John Hall’s God and Human Suffering; An Exercise in the Theology of the Cross. Hall’s concept of creation and suffering as “becoming” is one that has fascinated me since I first read the book. I have to admit that I don’t think I completely understand it, and that my understanding grows and changes in time.
Lastly, I would consult a cultural resource. I would probably watch Mel Gibson’s movie, “The Passion of the Christ.” While I realize that this movie is controversial in its depiction, and that it is not intended as a theological resource, the fact that it is a descriptive piece of the relationship between Christ and those for whom he brought salvation makes it a theological resource. The reason I would want to watch it would be for the “heart” side of the equation. This movie brings an emotional dimension to the story of the passion. I believe that the story of Christ’s suffering and death can not be dealt with on a purely cognitive level (nor, for that matter on a purely emotional level) but must include both dynamics.
D. Summary of critical issues which a theological exposition should take into account. (2 pages)
Since the suffering and death of Jesus Christ is a vital part of our understanding of faith (it is the “first half” of the equation, the outcome of which is grace and forgiveness), it is crucial that this portion of our faith be explored. Delving into issues around the “Theology of the Cross” and its relation to salvation are crucial to a full understanding of the gifts of God. If they are not taken fully into account, we risk falling into a pure “Theology of Glory” which ignores or sets aside the human experience, including human suffering.
There are three primary and fundamental questions that one might use as a starting point to reflect theologically on these issues.
The first question is simply “why is it necessary to recognize that the acts of salvation toward a sinful humanity must be purely understood as acts of God, not as a result of the striving of humanity.” While to those of us embedded in the Lutheran tradition, this question might look like a “no-brainer”, in ecumenical dialogue, this is not a simple question, and as members of the Christian church, we walk in ecumenical circles. Our grace-filled understanding of God’s work on earth is closely connected to our identity as Lutherans. But because the answers to this question are not as apparent in other circles, and because the people with whom we do ministry need to be aware of these fundamental identity issues and questions, the questions must be addressed.
The second question that would need to be addressed in a theological exposition of Christ’s suffering and death is simply “why was it necessary for Christ to suffer and die, and tangentally, why must humans undergo suffering in their lives?” Dr. Tony Campolo, of Eastern University in Philadelphia, made an intriguing observation in his talk at the ELCA Youth Gathering in New Orleans in 1997 that impacted my understanding of Christ’s sacrifice. Campolo stated that “Someone once asked me who the most sinful person in history was. They expected an answer like ‘Hitler, or Stalin.’ But they were shocked by my answer. The most sinful person who ever lived was Jesus Christ on the cross. Because at that moment, like a sponge, he absorbed in the sin of all people who had ever lived, were living, or who would ever live. The man who was the incarnation of God, became for 3 days the incarnation of sin, before he became the incarnation of grace.”
[5] This unfathomable act begs the question: Why was it necessary? Why did this have to happen? Just as easily as God caused the world to be created, or to be flooded and re-created, could not an all-powerful God have willed the restoration of our relationship into being?
This question is important because not only does it address issues of sacrifice, suffering and forgiveness, but it also moves into important issues of the will of, and the power and/or limitations of God.
And despite this act of taking on suffering on our behalf, humans are still subjected to suffering. Some of it is caused by the rest of a fallen humanity (i.e. hunger) and some by natural disaster. But the corrolary to the question of the necessity of Christ’s suffering is the question of human suffering. And for a humanity that suffers, this is often the first question of theology the people ask.
Finally, the issue that must be addressed is “What is the effect of Christ’s suffering on a fallen humanity?” This question might be paraphrased as “so what?” and “now what?” How do people experience Christ’s suffering, death, resurrection and forgiveness, and what are the implications for how we are to live our lives?
Like all good theological questions, these ones will not provide easy answers. Indeed, answering them is more like “peeling layers of an onion.” The more you peel, the more layers become apparent and more questions surface. But asking these questions and addressing them is crucial to growing in our understanding of the most important act in human history.
E. How does theological reflection facilitate more effective witness? (1/2 – 1 page)
I have discovered the value of theological reflection because of my work in the d.min program. Within that program, theological reflection was an expectation in all of the different seminar sessions. In that program, we were required to do theological reflection based on three categories: 1) Scriptural references; 2) Books (everything from John Hassler novels to theological texts by Martin Luther); and 3) Significant cultural events of experiences (i.e. the presidential election of 2000 and the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack).
While I admit to a certain amount of skepticism early in the process, (I have always been a fairly practical person more interested in product than in “process.” While I didn’t dislike process, I always wanted to move to the “what can we get done”, or “what will come of this” stage.) I discovered that I really enjoyed the theological reflection portion of the seminars. So much so that I made as one of the goals in my learning covenant for CPE that I wanted to have an opportunity to reflect theologically on my patient interactions.
What I have discovered is that theological reflection allows me to connect the material I have been examining to my own life in a way that is not possible without intentional introspection. For me, theological reflection creates a space for me to think, to pray and to wonder in a way that is unique in my experience. Coming out a largely cognitive, didactic Lutheran tradition, the idea of theological reflection was both challenging and life-giving for myself.
Theological reflection facilitates more effective witness because if done within the context of ministry, it invites the “other” into this space that I (and God’s Spirit) have created and draws them into the dialogue. This gives a glimpse into my life and faith. This is a new and hopefully more powerful understanding of “incarnational theology”, which I had always perceived as focusing on “role modeling” prior to my d.min work and my experiences with theological reflection. Hopefully this happens in such a way that invites that “other” to create their own space in which to explore their life and their faith.
For a time then, our two “spaces” intersect and cross. Hopefully over time, the other is able to differentiate their own space and then open it to share with others. Theological reflection is vital for effective witness, and it happens very organically.
III. Practice of Ministry (3-4 pages)
My response to the young person who asked if the class could watch The Passion of the Christ by Mel Gibson would be “Of course. Let’s do it.” I recognize that this might not be the answer that people in other congregations or ministry settings might give, but I think there are three reasons for doing this:
1. Young people are going to watch the movie. Especially given the controversial nature of the film, young people will be drawn to see it. A significant percentage of young people with whom I come into contact have, in fact, seen The Passion of the Christ. This being the case, I can think of no better place to see, process, reflect upon and integrate the contents of this movie than within the congregation. Watching it together, and creating a safe place to talk about these issues (including the areas of the film that may not be accurate, or which might have emphasized violence at the expense of Christ’s story) would be a healthy approach.
2. Because if a young person asks for and seeks out the opportunity to watch and discuss a piece of media that presents a portion of the story of Christ, we had better take that opportunity. They do not come along every day. This is especially the case if they ask to watch it with the pastor.
3. Much of the controversy surrounding the move is based on the level of violence in the film. This is a legitimate concern. The movie is rated “R”. I certainly would not want to do ministry within a vacuum that does not take seriously the role and presence of the parents. We would need to notify the parents of the opportunity to watch the movie and discuss it as a group and have them sign a permission form. We would also give them, and honor, the right to pull their young person from that activity.
But what I would really hope might happen would be to invite the parents of the young people to come to church and to watch the film alongside them. The discussion we might have would involve either the whole group, with the parents, and/or might integrate an opportunity for the family unit to sit down together to discuss what they had seen.
Turning this opportunity of a young person asking permission, into an event for family ministry, would have the potential to be very meaningful.
There is, of course, a broader rationale for watching the movie. As Christians, we are called to live “in” the world, but not to be “transformed by” the world. That means that while God calls us to be His people, and to not be “changed” by the world into something else, we are still called to live fully immersed in the world that God created. We do this both because it is where God called us to be, and because we can use our influence to bring the world closer to the vision of what God has for it. (I would suspect that this is part of Mel Gibson’s motivation in making the movie in the first place.)
H. Richard Neibuhr had this sense in mind when he wrote his book Christ and Culture. He defined different ways that humans interacted in the relationship between God and culture. These ways included Christ against culture, Christ of culture, Christ above culture, Christ and culture in paradox and Chrsit, the transformer of culture. While each of these perspectives can be considered “accurate” and “right” at different times for different perspectives, and while even in Lutheran circles we might land in different categories, it is clear that for Lutherans, we generally tend to fall into areas where we find Christ engaging culture. We cannot help ourselves but be immersed in culture, but trying not to be affected by it. We use what speaks to our faith and try to reject what does not, without turning our back to it, but trying to remain present to serve as witness.
This is a difficult balance. Certainly it might be easier for us to go the route of some other denominations and to “deny” culture, or to “reject” it out of hand. They preach against it, argue with it, isolate themselves from it and in many cases, isolate themselves from others who live within the culture. Their witness is one of “come and be like us, and then you will be worthy of God’s love.” As Lutherans, we worship a God who realized that “you can never be like me, I’ll have to enter into your culture to be present with you.” Christ sat with the tax collectors and prostitutes.
My hope with the confirmation students (and hopefully their parents) would to be watch the film with them, and then to read the story of the passion and to compare and contrast the two. I would ask them what they think Mel Gibson’s “agenda” was in creating the movie. I would remind them that as a Hollywood production, profit was a significant part of the motivation.
We would then enter into a conversation about times they have felt the presence of God. When were those times? What caused them to feel near to God? Then we would talk about God’s desire to be close to them and how the incarnation intended to make that a reality, as much for them as for the early Christians who walked alongside Jesus. The fundamental reality of the passion of the Christ was to be in a sacramental relationship with God’s creation. As a result, we are called to live in a sacramental lifestyle.
IV. Person in Ministry (3-4 pages)
One of my core beliefs is that there are two factors that are critical in a person’s effectiveness in long-term ministry. These two factors are 1) continuing their educational process, and 2) finding an effective network of support outside of their congregation.
In my time at Lord of Life I have witnessed these two elements being vital. Those colleagues of mine in youth and family ministry in other congregations who did not continue to stretch themselves and grow theologically, or in the practice of ministry, did not last. Likewise, if individuals did not connect to a peer group for support and networking, they soon felt the isolation of their ministry and left for other calls, or left ministry altogether.
I have a commitment to these two elements. In the almost 18 years that I have served as an Associate in Ministry, I have spent 11 of those as a student in some capacity at Luther Seminary. From spring of 1988, until spring of 1995 I was a part-time student in the MA-Youth and Family program. In 2001 I returned to Luther Seminary in the D.Min program-Youth and Family Ministry. In 2004 I took a leave from the D.Min program to “step back” and complete my M.Div equivalency requirements for the purpose of ordination. The “clock” will begin ticking again on the D.Min program on August 1, 2005.
I anticipate being involved in the work of the D.Min program for another three years before finishing that program. Education is one of my priorities; I am a life-long learner.
In addition, I have a strong commitment to education and networking through the work of the ELCA Youth Ministry Network. This organization focuses on providing opportunities for people to gather for learning, networking and support on a national scale annually, and supports smaller, local networks as well. I have personally experienced this form of networking through our local group of youth ministers who meet monthly.
In terms of cognitive learning and education, I have also grown greatly through the part-time adjunct teaching that I have done at Luther Seminary. Working both in the “Youth and Family Ministry Department”, and the “Educational Leadership Department
[6]”, I have been able to continue my reading and learning. To teach in these areas, I must keep current with research and new thinking in the field.
On a personal, spiritual level, maintaining a course of growth has been more of a challenge for me. I have friends who have a daily routine of morning prayer, or evening devotions. They are able to schedule their day in such a way that this is possible. I have attempted to create such a discipline, but it has never worked out for me. I make attempts, and am able to maintain a spiritual routine for awhile, but gradually the other things in my life begin to chip away at the time. As an “abstract-random” personality, this kind of spiritual discipline has never been particularly effective for me.
For me, I have found my growing edge to be in being able to identify “God moments” in day to day life. The value is in naming the moments where I can identify the hand of God at work in people’s lives.
I do read scripture daily. I do pray regularly. I read books that are not only academic, but books that are intended for personal growth. It just happens at different times, in different ways for me.
The key has been to be able to carve this time out, in whatever form and length it takes, and to maintain doing it as a discipline, regardless of when, where or how it happens. While this approach may appear to be “undisciplined” or “unplanned”, it has worked for me. For 18 years of full-time ministry I have been on a spiritual journey that has drawn me closer (and sometimes farther) from the God who remains constant. I continue to seek out new experiences and new ways to pray and to understand scripture. I have friends who hold me accountable, and I them. They ask the sometimes difficult questions that challenge me. My wife and I have been partners in the faith journey. Together we work to strengthen our relationship with God.
Most recently, and largely because of my experience with CPE, I have been focusing on “doing” less with my own personal faith, and “being” more. I have been trying to create space just to be in God’s presence. I have been trying to clear my mind and open myself to what God is doing in my life. I have been thinking of prayer more as a spiritual and emotional “place” than a “thing to do.”
[7] Within my community then, I work to assist others in creating the same kind of space. I work to help them identify their gifts and their styles, so that they can recognize that however they practice their Christian spirituality, works for them.
My hope is that we would create together community experiences in which participants know together the presence of Christ. My responsibility is to encourage, inspire and passionate faith, authentic community and significant service so that God’s transforming grace is experienced.
As a pastor I hope to do this by drawing alongside people, entering into their lives and walking with them for awhile. I hope to ask questions. I hope to challenge. I hope to explore faith with people. I hope to experience God’s grace with people.
Dr. Roland Martinson, my seminary advisor and one of my mentors, likes to say that God “fusses” in people’s lives. An important part of ministry, I believe, is helping people to name that “fussing” in their lives, to realize the dependence we have on God, and to be with them as they realize the implications, asking themselves, to borrow a phrase, “what does this mean for us?”
[1] Tiede, Dr. David, Luke; Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament. Augsburg Publishing House, Minneapolis, Mn; 1988. p. 201.
[2] Ibid., p. 202.
[3] ibid., p. 204.
[4] Manning, Brennan; The Ragamuffin Gospel; Good News for the Bedraggled, Beat-Up, and Burnt Out; Multinomah Press; Portland, Oregon, 1990; pp. 194-195.
[5] Dr. Anthony Campolo, speaking at the ELCA Youth Gathering, July, 1997, New Orleans, Louisiana, speaking in a general assembly in the Superdome before an audience of 45,000 high school students and their adult leaders.
[6] These departments will be merging, effective Sept. 1, 2005, into the new “Children’s Youth and Family Ministries Department.”
[7] In this, I have had a wonderful mentor in Rev. Bill Kees, of the ELCA Youth Ministries and Gathering Team. I have learned much from his wisdom and experience.